EDUC 633 Blog 2
Here we are again in the heart of the wonderful Texas Hill
Country to discuss my second blog of the Principles of Design and Management in
Distance Education course from Liberty University. The subject this week
involves the question what is learning and what theory of learning best fits my
education course development with distance education and e-learning.
First of all the best definition I have heard that is short
and to the point is borrowed from ( Mayer 2011a). It says learning is “The
change in the learner’s knowledge due to experience.” It has three elements,
change, knowing, and experience. Mayer also defines instruction as “a set of
research-based principles for how to design, identify, and deliver
instruction.” Instruction knowledge is thus based on research and science.
Learning is dependent upon the demands of core material that is integrated,
organized, and edited by the initiation of the learner to make sense. Relevant
and real material are necessary for the learner to be motivated to learn. That
is why the integration of hearing, seeing, and feeling need to be transferred
into knowledge and skills for the human memory says (Clark and Meyer2011) These
are all by the process of select, manage, integrate, and retrieve.
My favorite learning theory is constructionist as it shifts
learning from the teacher as lecturer, knowledge imparter, to one of
facilitator, collaborator, guide, and co-learner. He is a catalyst for active
learning and fits best in the e-learning scheme. He encourages dialogue between
himself and his students to summarize, question, generate, identify and predict
in solving different inputs and outcomes.(Palinscar1984). His students learn to
draw conclusions and to collaborate their knowledge into a workable whole outcome.
Case studies and strategies like Web-Quest are very usable as is online and
virtual teaching by web and closed circuit.
The outcomes are all student centered as they are the activity
generators of this learning theory. A
student’s prior knowledge can best be integrated into this system as he
performs authentic tasks with authentic outcomes. His learning is truly
experiential. Constructionism fits the definition best of learning and allows
knowledge construction rather than just the communication of knowledge. It
involves all the senses integrating together, drawing conclusions and
inferences. Sensory overload is one of its problems as we have to keep the
input simple and uncluttered. This is a typical problem with audio/visuals.
Organization can become a problem if teacher direction is not included. Reality
is the key to this theory of learning. Scientific method lends itself greatly
to this theory.
References
Clark, R. & Mayer, R. (2011). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction, San Francisco, CA:
Pfeiffer
Hall, D. (2008). The Technology director’s guide to
leadership, Washington, DC: ISTE
Palincsar, A. & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of
comprehension-fostering and
comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition & Instruction, 1(2),
117-175.
Hello Verne,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed listening to your video blog this week. As usual you brought a wealth of information to life in you discussion. You made some good points. I discussed behaviorism in my video blog but I can identify with your discussion of constructionism as well. I believe that students learn to use critical thinking with the constructionism theory. I also believe that the online environment works well with this type theory. The instructor acts as the facilitator and the student controls what they bring to their learning environment and how they learn for that matter. I believe that some students are better suited for this type of learning theory than others. Many of my students come to us straight out of high school and they are not motivated enough to do well in this type setting. Again, I enjoyed your video.
In Christ,
Linda